Religion and Controversy

I recently read an article listed in the Washington Post titled “Openly Religious, to a Point.” Throughout the article, the issues of President Bush’s religious views are questioned. Some wonder what Bush’s religious views are because he “speaks softly” about what he believes. Yet, I don’t understand why it has to be spelled out for everyone. As the President of the United States, one has the duty to serve and represent the entire population of the U.S. If President Bush were to discuss his religious beliefs, then his reasons for enforcing political policies and decisions would always be questioned. People who hold different beliefs than the President would feel misrepresented because they would feel that Bush was going off of his religious beliefs. I agree that Bush probably agrees and disagrees with certain issues because of his beliefs, but that isn’t what always affects our thinking. Many people declare themselves of a certain religion. Yet, some of these people also disagree with certain aspects of a chosen religion. Therefore, one cannot strictly determine if someone, or Bush, makes a decision based on their religion or a view they hold. Because there are so many, religion should not play a role in the issues that develop America.
Each individual holds their own views; therefore, if Bush were to discuss his position on religion, many people would be offended when he makes decisions even if it weren’t based upon his religious beliefs. People are always going to look for an argument or reason to disagree. Therefore, I feel that religion should be left out of it.